NSW Police Should Not Have Sonic Weapons
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a87f/1a87f77d5ec6289a8ac57e4c21d2503a816173ab" alt="NSW Police Should Not Have Sonic Weapons"
[This is a letter I've sent to my NSW MP. Perhaps you could send something similar to your MP?]
I'm writing asking for assistance to take these mass punishment devices away from police.
On Jun 12, at Hyde Park, NSW Police threatened the use of, and then tested, the euphemistically named "Long Range Acoustic Device", a sonic weapon (LRAD). All LRAD models of capable of inflicting mass punishment on anyone in the area, all capable of sounds well above the threshold required for causing permanent nerve damage and hearing loss.
These weapons are no joke, they cause extreme pain and discomfort, and undermine our right to protest, which is critical to democracy. Many people left the protest when the LRAD came out on Jun 12 -- who wants to risk permanent hearing loss?
You can clearly hear NSW Police test the weapon on this Nine News video, and you can see Superintendent Gavin Wood talking into a microphone labelled "LRAD" clearly on this Nine News video.
Then the NSW Police Assistant Commissioner Mick Willing flatly lied about this to the media, claiming "There is one issue I want to clarify out there about the alleged use of some sort of sound weapon by police, 'That is not the case, police officers used a normal loud hailer to issue a warning to the crowd.' (Daily Mail link, unfortunately) or a megaphone (Sydney Morning Herald link). All LRAD devices are sonic weapons capable of permanent damage, none are "normal loud hailers".
Does the NSW Police have such little oversight that they think they can simply lie about this without consequence?
Our police simply should not have these occupying-army weapons. The weapons will disable people, and even without being used they have a chilling effect on protest and democracy. I'd like you to try to take away these weapons from Police, using whatever means necessary -- law changes, budget scrutiny, whatever.
Thank you,
- Mark Hansen.
Appendix
It looks like they were using a handheld LRAD 100X, capable of 137dB.
Every LRAD is a weapon. The company does not produce a "normal loud speaker" pic.twitter.com/CJbbnUu7fO
— Tom Raue (@TomRaue) June 13, 2020
NSW Police have responded to "social media commentary" about the use of a Long Range Acoustic Device, saying in a press conference that "it was a normal loud-hailer." @9NewsSyd pic.twitter.com/oOFfPX3WuP
— andrew rickert (@_rockrit) June 12, 2020
JUST IN: Police have issued a final direction for Sydney Black Lives Matter protesters to leave Hyde Park and Town Hall. #9News
— Nine News Sydney (@9NewsSyd) June 12, 2020
Full coverage: https://t.co/LYpv9Ngahe pic.twitter.com/ejr0qUJ2Vf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ebb1/3ebb1eb26d7985dc22d5a93fa0ee336640efe7d6" alt="Picture of the LRAD 100X model, with picture of its microphone. The picture matches what the police held in Sydney."
#LIVE: NSW Police are providing an update regarding a Black Lives Matter protest in the Sydney CBD. #9News https://t.co/muSkprYMwr
— Nine News Australia (@9NewsAUS) June 12, 2020
Tom Raue has written a short history of the LRAD, what it does, how to react if one is deployed.
These weapons are designed to be used against protesters. If the "health reasons" argument was real they wouldn't be using weapons that can permanently damage hearing.
— David Shoebridge (@ShoebridgeMLC) June 12, 2020
Comments ()